MackCollier.com

  • Blog
  • Mack’s Bio
  • Work With Mack
    • See Mack’s Work
  • Buy Think Like a Rock Star
  • Book Mack to Speak

December 8, 2010 by Mack Collier

Setting the record straight on online reviews: An interview with Bazaarvoice’s Ian Greenleigh

A few months ago Ian Greenleigh gave me some great stats and case studies from some of Bazaarvoice‘s clients on how they were benefiting from online ratings and reviews.  I published those findings in a post that proved to be one of the most popular here so far this year.  So I wanted to bring Ian back to let him talk more about the power of online ratings, reviews and comments:

Mack:  Tell us what you do and why you are awesome.

Ian: I manage social media for Bazaarvoice. This includes oversight and content creation for all of your “usual suspect” channels, but I focus most on making sure we have a leading corporate blog that adds value and contributes to our thought leadership. Personally, I’m most active on Twitter (be3d).

Bazaarvoice: We help our clients build revenue by building customer conversations into their businesses. This takes the form of hosted & moderated solutions like Ratings & Reviews, Ask & Answer and Stories.

Mack: What’s the biggest misconception you think most companies have about online reviews?

Ian: Many companies don’t understand that negative reviews are normally a net benefit if they’re open to them. Here are a couple of ways they help:

  • They help the company appear more authentic and credible
  • Negative reviews are better than no reviews at all—products/services with more reviews (even if they’re negative) get more clicks than products with fewer or no reviews
  • Negative reviews often alert companies to product flaws that can then be addressed to lead to increased sales in the next product release
  • Negative reviews provide a more realistic view of the product to customers. They return this product less often, because they know what they’re getting and aren’t surprised by shortcomings.
  • Companies might think that if they don’t invite reviews, they simply won’t have to deal with them. Instead, they end up having to address these reviews outside of their “home turf”, in the social web where they have far less control and influence. Letting the conversations take place on company websites makes more sense because conversations are more easily tracked, complaints are easier to address and results are far more instantaneous.

Mack: Do you have any stats on how Bazaarvoice’s clients have seen an increase or decrease in sales after adding Ratings and Reviews to their site?

Ian:  Sure, from our stats page:

  • Products with syndicated reviews convert 26% higher. (Bazaarvoice Case Study, 2009)
  • MarketingExperiments tested product conversion with and without product ratings by customers. Conversion nearly doubled, going from .44% to 1.04% after the same product displayed its five-star rating. (MarketingExperiments Journal, July 2007)
  • Giving shoppers the ability to sort products within a category by customer rating led to a sales increase of 41% per unique visitor. (PETCO, June 2007)
  • 11% of retailers reported a 20% or more overall increase in conversions as a result of adding reviews to their sites, 21% reported an 11% to 20% increase and 5% reported a 1% to 10% increase. (eTailing Group, June 2008)

Mack:  If a company encounters a ‘negative’ blog post or comment from a customer, how should they handle it?

Ian: As long as the content is not ad-hominem of offensive, concerns should be addressed head on. When this doesn’t happen, you see things like the famous United Breaks Guitars video. Keep in mind that others are watching to see what is done about the complaint, so a public response is usually warranted. One of the best ways to take the conversation in a better direction is to leave a follow up comment saying that someone is going to call, email, etc., and then take the conversation offline toward resolution. This at least tells all the people watching the post that you’re taking action.

Mack: When a company encounters a comment they want to address online, should they have a ‘chain of command’ in place so certain employees handle certain comments based on topic/tone/etc, or should the employee that finds the comment always be the one to respond?

Ian: Responses should be assigned out to employees by role/expertise, but locating and cataloguing negative comments should be a centralized task. Employees that happen upon them should know who to ping in order to resolve the complaint. Alternatively, companies can adopt a “respond if it’s in your wheelhouse” policy, telling employees to pass along anything they don’t feel comfortable responding to (or don’t have the knowledge for). Either way, centralized records should be kept and incident data trended over time.

Great information once again from Ian, and really helpful advice on handling negative blog comments and the power of online reviews and rankings.  As Ian shows above, clients that use ratings actually benefit, as do companies that handle negative comments correctly.  Thanks again Ian, and please follow Mr. Greenleigh on Twitter at @be3d.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Blogging, Social Media, Social Media Monitoring, Twitter Tagged With: Bazaarvoice, Ian Greenleigh, monitoring, Negative Blog Comments, Online Ratings

May 4, 2009 by Mack Collier

Your Social Media Strategy Starts With Monitoring

If your company is ready to dive into the social media waters, which tools such they examine first? Blogs? Facebook? Twitter? Wrong. Try Google.

Before you can launch a successful social media strategy, you must begin monitoring existing conversations about your company. This has several advantages:

1 – It lets you be proactive in responding to complaints from customers. Want to impress a customer that’s blogged about a problem they are having with your product? Leave a comment 15 mins after their post goes up, then follow up with an email attempting to help them with their problem. If you are sincere in trying to help that customer, you’re almost assured of flipping her from being an angry customer, to a passionate advocate for you.

2 – It helps create evangelists for your brand. See above. Not only are you giving angry customers a reason to become a fan, but you’re validating to your existing fans why they love your company. If Bob is passionately promoting your company on his blog, but stopping by his blog and leaving a quick ‘Thank You!’ comment, you validate why he loves you to begin with.

3 – It increases your brand equity. By actively monitoring the blogosphere and other social sites, your company can develop a reputation of reaching out to and helping customers. Also, as you gain a reputation for being responsive, it helps set you apart from competitors that aren’t as responsive.

4 – It makes you more familiar with social media tools and sites. Once you begin monitoring the blogosphere and social media sites for company mentions, you’ll begin to better understand how ideas spread in this space, and how blogs work. You get a better understand of how your customers are communicating with each other and how those interactions change based on the site they are on at that moment.

 

Remember that monitoring what customers are already saying about your company and your space simply improves your chances of communicating effectively with those customers.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Social Media Monitoring Tagged With: google blog search, monitoring, plurk, Social Media, Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Understanding Substack’s Three Growth Stages
  • Blogging Isn’t Dead, it’s Morphed Into Substack
  • The Backstage Pass is Moving to Substack
  • Easter and the Three Eternal Gifts God Gives to Christians
  • Research: 97% of Loyalty Programs Fail Due to This Simple Design Flaw

Categories

Archives

Comment Policy

Be nice, be considerate, be friendly. Any comment that I feel doesn't meet these simple rules can and probably will be deleted.

Top Posts & Pages

  • Understanding Substack's Three Growth Stages
  • Why Did Jesus Send His Apostles Out With Nothing?
  • The Difference Between a Brand Ambassador and a Brand 'Spokesperson'
  • How Much Money Will You Make From Writing a Book?
  • Blogging Isn't Dead, it's Morphed Into Substack
  • I Do Not Deserve to Suffer Like This...
  • The Case For Adding 'Easter Eggs' to Your Blog Posts
  • How to Write Better Blog Posts That Both Google and Twitter Will Love
  • Monster Energy is the Red Bull That You've Never Heard Of
  • How Much Does Social Media Cost Companies in 2012?

  • Blog
  • Mack’s Bio
  • Work With Mack
  • Buy Think Like a Rock Star
  • Book Mack to Speak

Copyright © 2025 · Executive Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

%d